Interesting take on Candace. Not sure if I agree. She’s scary to me because her fans seem so devoted and what she says is so fake. But I suppose you also make a good point, a lot of this is true about the mainstream media as well.
I don’t know, it’s sort of tricky, because if we take this to the nth degree, everyone is listening to their own Candace and the mainstream media is either dead or no longer mainstream. I don’t know if that world looks better or worse than what we have right now.
It would not be ideal but I do think that it would be better than what we have now. In a world where thousands of different subculture each had their own favorite pundit, no one faction would be able to force their will on the rest of the country.
The fascinating question is how do we know what's real? The list of examples of what she believes contains a lot of weird stuff but also the "racist conspiracy theory" that Floyd died of a drug overdose. This is obviously (a) not a conspiracy theory, (b) not racist and (c) probably true, as must have been realized by anyone who actually saw the full video of what happened.
I've often found this to be the problem with those who decry conspiracy theories and non mainstream thinking. They will list several things their enemies believe which do indeed sound pretty crazy, followed by one thing that is almost certainly not crazy and actually true. This just raises questions over the entire list.
As an amateur fiction writer I get goosebumps whenever I ecnounter real life foreshadowing. Here is an example relevant to this article: the Christchurch shooter's manifesto written in 2019 was full of jokes and memes. One of the jokes was something like "I did this for my hero Candace Owens".
I have noticed that people who believe in DEI and/or mass immigration consistently underrate the automomy of the people they're inviting into their organizations or countries. It's weirdly racist in a way. Soft bigotry of low expectations.
Have you even watched the Becoming Brigette series? If you watch it, it would be hard to still believe that person is a woman. It’s very thoroughly sourced
I actually think she’s gotten better recently because her husband is a hardcore Catholic and converted her so he’s actually providing her some reasoning behind these things and is able to avoid falling into female solipsism and instead upholds natural law
I find the "transvestigation" movement embodied by Owen's claims about Brigitte Macron to be extremely interesting, even though I have a 99% credence that it's bullshit. There's something fascinating about this theory that the mannish-looking wives of all these powerful men are actually transexuals as part of some bizarre elite conspiracy. My favorite specific example is the idea that Michelle (or Michael) Obama is actually a man, and the further idea that Joan Rivers was whacked for calling her/him out as such.
It is fated that Kanye shall father a child with Candace. His name shall be Dark Adolph, and he will lead the world into a new age…
Ownes is obviously smart, skilled at defending what she believes, and photogenic. She also claimed that dinosaurs are a hoax to deny God.
Dinosaur denial should be a crime instead of holocaust denial
Interesting take on Candace. Not sure if I agree. She’s scary to me because her fans seem so devoted and what she says is so fake. But I suppose you also make a good point, a lot of this is true about the mainstream media as well.
I don’t know, it’s sort of tricky, because if we take this to the nth degree, everyone is listening to their own Candace and the mainstream media is either dead or no longer mainstream. I don’t know if that world looks better or worse than what we have right now.
It would not be ideal but I do think that it would be better than what we have now. In a world where thousands of different subculture each had their own favorite pundit, no one faction would be able to force their will on the rest of the country.
Right… but what does that mean about things getting done? Idk it’s hard to fathom that reality
The fascinating question is how do we know what's real? The list of examples of what she believes contains a lot of weird stuff but also the "racist conspiracy theory" that Floyd died of a drug overdose. This is obviously (a) not a conspiracy theory, (b) not racist and (c) probably true, as must have been realized by anyone who actually saw the full video of what happened.
I've often found this to be the problem with those who decry conspiracy theories and non mainstream thinking. They will list several things their enemies believe which do indeed sound pretty crazy, followed by one thing that is almost certainly not crazy and actually true. This just raises questions over the entire list.
I love that she is ahead of little Benny
As an amateur fiction writer I get goosebumps whenever I ecnounter real life foreshadowing. Here is an example relevant to this article: the Christchurch shooter's manifesto written in 2019 was full of jokes and memes. One of the jokes was something like "I did this for my hero Candace Owens".
I have noticed that people who believe in DEI and/or mass immigration consistently underrate the automomy of the people they're inviting into their organizations or countries. It's weirdly racist in a way. Soft bigotry of low expectations.
Candace’s slop is likely to slow the adoption of embryo selection for IQ in the US. That’s a bad thing.
Candace’s (and others’) slop might bite us in the ass too. There are worse things than the current elite.
No, there is almost nothing worse than the current elite.
That seems very unlikely.
Have you even watched the Becoming Brigette series? If you watch it, it would be hard to still believe that person is a woman. It’s very thoroughly sourced
Do you think the Holocaust happened? If so, why do you think it's a good thing to be a skeptic of it?
I actually think she’s gotten better recently because her husband is a hardcore Catholic and converted her so he’s actually providing her some reasoning behind these things and is able to avoid falling into female solipsism and instead upholds natural law
I find the "transvestigation" movement embodied by Owen's claims about Brigitte Macron to be extremely interesting, even though I have a 99% credence that it's bullshit. There's something fascinating about this theory that the mannish-looking wives of all these powerful men are actually transexuals as part of some bizarre elite conspiracy. My favorite specific example is the idea that Michelle (or Michael) Obama is actually a man, and the further idea that Joan Rivers was whacked for calling her/him out as such.
You should watch it. It’s legit. Brigitte Macron is a man.
I watched it and I was not convinced
Bullshit. You’re a partisan hack. What else do you need to see?